Hot New Top All Games Games (Main) Games (Hangout) Offtopic Offtopic (Main) Offtopic (Hangout)
"Are these alt posts just vying for 'craven post of the day' on kiwi farms or something?"

KHarvey16's Actioned Posts



EtcetEraThread New Evidence Supporting Credibility Of Tara Reade’s Allegation Against Joe Biden Emerges
Reason User Banned (Duration Pending): Concern trolling in a topic about sexual assault allegations; history of similar behaviour. Long history of concern trolling in sensitive threads.
It's not leeway or "advocation." I'm not vouching for Biden or arguing he isn't a rapist because he's such a good guy. My thoughts do not stem from a belief he isn't capable of this or wouldn't do it. I'm getting a little bit tired of being told why I hold a position that it seems most other people following the story hold, and having it always come down to being naive, overly optimistic or some other general failure of reasoning. My position is I'm not prepared to call him a rapist based on the evidence we have been presented with to this point. My argument is that isn't an unreasonable position, that it doesn't make me or anyone who holds that position a rape apologist and it's completely compatible with support for believing women and the me too movement. Take accusations seriously and do the investigation. Multiple outlets have released the results of their inquiries. More work is being done and I and everyone else awaits the results. I hope whatever evidence is there is exposed. Any contemporaneous evidence to support the rape allegation would be very helpful. I think the Kavanaugh situation is a good example of what that could look like. Some of those working in the office at the same time have contradicted her descriptions of how the office in general and her role specifically functioned. Clarification there would be great. There's been lots of evidence supporting the allegations of inappropriate touching and violations of personal space. In general I think that's a decent model. Find some reasonable consensus on details with the 21 or so others interviewed. The above assumes she has any desire to keep pushing this publicly. She can do as much or as little as she wants or feels comfortable with. Her general sentiment seems to not specifically be a desire to see anyone punished but to get her story out there. If what she's provided so far is all she is comfortable sharing, that's obviously fine. The people reading those claims and the reporting around them should be free to reach reasonable conclusions based on them. I asked what people felt Biden's options were because he's now on the defensive after the allegation, not because I am interested in giving him leeway.


EtcetEraThread Democratic Presidential Primaries & Caucuses |March OT| Super Tuesday Turbo XD Championship Edition & Knuckles (Discussion Guidelines in OP)
Reason User Banned (1 week): ignoring the modpost in regards to trolling
Maybe you could back the claim up. Who here says Bernie is the reason Hillary lost?


EtcetEraThread Washington Post Retracts Bernie Sanders Image After Charges of Anti-Semitism
Reason User Banned (1 month): trolling in a sensitive thread and causing a derail
There was 9 photos and they chose the first. Not “any other photo ever.” Your argument is disingenuous at best. Maybe you can work on posting some addition irrelevant details to make yourself feel better. Sorry your initial argument was bad. It’s not my fault. Continue with being aggressive.


EtcetEraThread Citations Needed: Nate Silver and the Crisis of Pundit Brain
Reason User Banned (1 Week): Hostility and Thread Derailment Over Multiple Posts; History of Similar Behavior
Maybe read the fucking thread? It didn’t just appear out of nowhere.


EtcetEraThread Police: White Man Reportedly Killed Teenager Because Teen's Rap Music Made Suspect Feel 'Unsafe'
Reason User Banned (Duration Pending): Hostility and Antagonizing Other Users Over Multiple Posts in this Thread; Prior Bans for Similar Behavior
You don’t have anything even resembling a substantive argument so you have to yell a lot. Your argument is purely emotional. “I want bad people to die and that’s that! Can’t tell me otherwise, I won’t hear it! Making me feel better is worth killing innocents!”


EtcetEraThread Ellen Page calls out Chris Pratt's "infamously anti-LGBTQ" church
Reason User Banned (1 Month): Dismissing concerns surrounding homophobia and antagonizing other members; long history of trolling and disruptive behavior
Oh, a troll? Not figuratively? I'm not the one approaching this with an agenda.


EtcetEraThread Will you guys #Mute Michael Jackson when his documentary comes out?
Reason User banned (2 weeks): Hostility, inflammatory strawman + long history of personal attacks
Look at how mad you are that children weren’t abused by a pedophile.


EtcetEraThread Tim Cook to Investors: People Bought Fewer New iPhones Because They Repaired Their Old Ones - Apple finally says that repair hurts its bottom line.
Reason User Banned (1 Week): History of hostility and antagonizing other members
If they have the cash to make payments, they literally can afford the loan. You're really not following along. I used a word. I was then told it didn't mean what I intended it to mean, which happens to be the literal definition. I was told I was contradicting myself because I used a word another person defined differently from how it is literally defined and how I used it. Arguing I'm the one in the wrong here is ludicrous.But that's not the dictionary definition of the word or how I used it.


EtcetEraThread Tim Cook addresses iPhone pricing.
Reason User Banned (1 Day): Repeatedly antagonizing other members
I see the thread very clearly. I think you respond and form responses without thinking and fill in the reasoning after. It’s a hallmark of a poor argument. They’re addicts! But I don’t mean that as an insult. They’re a cult! But I was just being hyperbolic. You want very badly to strongly believe a thing but you don’t really know what and don’t want anyone to argue against whatever nebulous critique you can’t quite decide on yet.