EtcetEraThreadTransmisogyny (and other awful stuff) in Uncanny X-Men (spoilers)
ReasonUser Banned (1 Week): Dismissing concerns surrounding prejudice, multiple previous infractions for antagonistic and behavior
So? These things happen. Those scenes are meant to make you feel bad whoever you are, at least that is the intention the realisation not so much.
Are you suggesting we can't depict violence on trans people and women because they could feel bad? What kind of logic is that?
What it seems to me is that you are making loads of assumption based on the race and gender of the creator. There is no indication that he is what you are accusing him of
GamingThread"Games as a service" is fraud. - Accursed Farms
ReasonUser Banned (3 Days): Arguing in bad faith over a series of posts
So he gave his own personal GaaS definition which is by all extent the most general I have seen and then discusses it? A bit weird. Nobody here would call Unrea; Tournament 2004 a GaaS.
But with the same definition wouldn't be almost every single game published this generation a GaaS? Almost every released single player and multiplayer had a big d1 patch that made the game from better to flat out playable.
Again words matter, you can't give your own definition of GaaS and that discuss it like you want.
If this is not the case please tell me and I will watch the video, if not this is useless. It's like discussing racism by giving a complete wrong definition of racism at the start I don't need a video of a nobody to discuss anything, particularly if the conversation is tabled by him in that fashion.
This is a forum, we can discuss any idea. GaaS is not invented by the guy in the OP is an ongoing conversion in the community and I am free to quote every single one of you and carry on the discussion.
Either you have such a law esteem of yourselves that you think the only way to discuss something is watching somebody else's opinion or you don't think you are good enough to articulate a response that goes in accord with the one of OP.
If you agree with him you are supposed to convince other people or talk about this in the future, are you so incapable to do so that you will post this video as response?
Yes I haven't even watched the video and it comes out that not only the title is clickbait and that he uses shitty sources to prove his point, but that he also gave an entire debate side based on his own personal definition of a world.