I agree. But i dont think its at all comparable to give people m4a with no stipulations or penalty fines vs the AcA which most people agree isnt anywhere near a perfect solution and has a fair share of problems that make it easier to attack. 8 years of M4A, id wager, would be significantly more difficult to reverse than 8 years of the AcA. And as mentioned, they couldnt even get the votes to roll that back. While I entirely agree that that assessment is generally fair, were talking about a case where the explicitly didnt have the votes for it and she still voted no.So youre having trouble with reading comprehension than because i didnt suggest or say anything of the sort when you quoted me. What part of that post said what you inferred?