My point there was Bernie exhibited poor judgment of character. Which is a fact. I loosely characterized him as "an asset" because it would trigger someone like you to flip out and go on a tirade in defense of the great Bernie. Fact is, he was a useful idiot for the Russians four years ago as well. You can be an asset to a foreign adversary without necessarily being on the take for it. This is the distinction between being willfully complicit (Gabbard) and being a useful tool to depress progressive turnout against Clinton (Sanders)... both of which serve to the ultimate end of putting a wholly compromised puppet like Trump in a position of power and influence and keeping him there. It's not my fault if you can't understand the difference between the two. FYI, I look forward to your endorsement of Gabbard for president next year after Bernie loses his bid for the Dem nomination once again.