Hot New Top All Games Games (Main) Games (Hangout) Offtopic Offtopic (Main) Offtopic (Hangout)
"We do not allow our members to make claims or arguments not based on reality"

Post 17537186

Not Voted


EtcetEraThread 2020 Democratic Presidential Primary | OT | Democrats in disarray....oh wait, no, just Tulsi's campaign
Reason User Banned (permanent): trolling over a series of posts, account still in junior phase
Here's a response that makes me happy. Thank you. Now, with your response in mind, I want to go back up the rabbit hole and look back a bit further in the discussion. My questions to you would then be: 1) Is it for the greater good that, assuming a position of identity politics, one choose the minority less-well represented in politics, or is this outweighed by former bad policies which have since been renounces? You make a convincing argument for the latter, that Harris is ultimately a better representative, but I'd like to see why I should feel that Tulsi's recanted viewes are worse than the viewes held by Harris during her tine as a prosecutor which have not been satisfactorily recanted. 2) Back even earlier in the discussion, I said that I am sceptical about promises about college tuition made by Bernie, and even Medicare for all supported by many candidates. How should I look into that? Most Libertarians make the argument that these social programmes are not necessarily rights, and that the government funding them is futile becauseit creates dependency. I am unconvinced by the Libertarian argument, but see no reason to outright reject it. When I have presented Democratic socialist ideas to them, I wind up utterly demolished sometimes, while somewhat "victorious" (if you could call it that) equally frequently. Given that I have not had success in such debates, or at least not reliably, shall I resign to an indefinite "I'm gullible," regardless how much I have read form sources of equal repute? And, finally, back to my original post, polling has Bernie with a very good shot -- and the runner-up effect seems somewhat convincing to me. Do you think that that is a valid assessment? This last question is less a question to you specifically, and more just in the general flow of the thread.