No I disagree. This is a 5 second clip on a much bigger video that was o ly identified by Jared Holt who runs a site called right wign watch who is an alt right watchdog site. If there is any signaling it is Jared virtue signaling by ousting this 5 second clip as bigger than it is. If you reasearch the guy you see tbat he lives for this but no. We cannot question his motives because then we get labeled. We can only question PDP and condemn him over nothing this time around. You empower these ideas by attacking them and making the electronically taboo. No one cared until the guy made a big deal with his tweet. Instead of reaching out and trying to have some civil discourse he did a hit piece. All that was missing from that tweet was a thank you and a *pats himself in the back* Maybe on another video I could see your claims but not for this bs. We'll just have to agree to disagree. You can insult me and label me anything you want if it makes you feel better.I am not giving PDP the benefit of the doubt. I am calling out this whole thing because in this especific case I disagree. It is making something very insignificant big for attention. I say SJW because that is the term that our society has come up for this. Just as some people use Nazis or call everyone alt right when they say something they don't agree with, some are called SJW. And looking at the authir of the tweet it fits. He runs a site called right wing watch if that is mot being a social justice warrior I am not sure. I am sure they've made hit pieces on people that are not even right just because they disagree wotht heir opinions. I have an issue with people today using social media platforms as hit pieces for social credit. The other day some kind was trying to shame Gordon Ramsey for some very public video out some shady stuff he did back in 2010. It was a very public video but he still had to make the "hit piece" for thise likes and follower. This is the kind of outrage I compare this video controversy with.