Example A - She wants Latin Americans to starve to death at our borders and to ban to all muslims from entering the US to preserve a white ethno state Example B - She is a troll who likes edgy conservative humor which we find highly offensive Which one these logical extremes do you think is more likely to reflect her? Which one of these things would you think Woolie, who is more familiar with all parties involved, would continue to associate with? It's easy to dismiss people you disagree with and judging them by standards which do not apply to them. It protects your interests and I get that. Try to think of this through a conservative lens and ask yourself what lines did she actually cross? None of the receipts I've seen say alt right. Her assosiates? Sure. But I don't believe in guilt by association. It would cast a grim shadow on gamers/ christians/ the left/ furries/ etc. Oh and comedians aren't politcal figures. Wtf.