I'm actually wondering if the - but you travel by plane - but your clothes - but your phone - but you drive a car - ethical consumption impossible - vegan food is inaccessible and expensive - what about -- plants -- insects -- lobsters -- other sources of CO2 emissions post are real or if you're all having a laugh? You wouldn't EVER accept a line of reasoning this laughable if we were talking political issues other than veganism. But since we're talking about something that evokes dissonance in a demonstratively high number of users on here, we seem to be more willing to let logical fallacies slide. Like, what do you expect me to respond to any of that garbage? "". Okay dude, nice meme. GOT ME. Since perfection is unattainable, let's not opt for the next best thing - nah man - let's ackchyually go for the . Since ethical consumption is impossible, let's just make things easy and accessible even to the guy with the Zelda avatar: everything's binary. You are ethical or you aren't. Since the former is, I concede, probably not attainable (and most certainly not by me), ethics can't possibly factor into things we buy and consume. This is not a strawman - it's PRECISELY what those trashy takes up there imply.